Hannablue's profileBlue LoungePhotosBlogListsMore ![]() | Help |
|
October 16 Jongeren en kunst/ Helen MarshallYou're The Boss - Chisenhale Gallery Education - London - 2008You're The Boss was an intensive one week art project commissioned by Chisenhale Gallery for 12-14 year olds. The young people 'hired' the artist they wanted to work with and designed an event and interactive art exhibition open to the general public at the end of the week. They visited the Tate Modern to respond on the exhibition, Duchamp, Manray & Picabia, and they chose the way they wanted to work and with what media they could use. They created artworks as individuals and collaboratively. They had to work with a budget, find ways to market their event that included a walkabout around the local park to hand out invitations and talk to the public. They created a photo & video booth area, scanning & printing area and a research & experimentation area. They worked with text, exquisite corpses, object installations, still life's, sets and costumes. Discussion was an important aspect of the project and they made their own group name and manifesto. Source:
Great initiatives! Hannablue
October 14 SnowEskimo's have many words to for ice and snow.tlapa powder snow
Have a nice day, and enjoy the first nightfrost . Miss Hannablue October 09 Georgia O Keefe
Out of the Erotic Ghetto
The Whitney’s welcome retrospective rescues Georgia O’Keeffe from sex and flowers.Poor Georgia O’Keeffe. Death didn’t soften the opinions of the art world toward her paintings. Twenty-three years later, many continue to dismiss her as a prissy painter of pretty pictures—or, I should say, pretty genitalia. Even when hailed for being “the most famous and highly paid woman artist in America,” she gets saddled with a qualifier.
No other figure in American art history went from heights to has-been so quickly. See if these comments, some of them by women, don’t make the hairs on the back of your neck stand up. Critics wrote of the “great painful and ecstatic climaxes” in the art of “this girl,” of how she felt “through the womb,” and gave us a “sense of woman’s flesh in martyrdom.” Her paintings were said to be a “revelation of the very essence of woman as Life Giver,” expressing “dense, quivering, endless life,” and “the world as it is known to woman.” We read about her “outpouring of sexual juices,” “loamy hungers of the flesh,” and her art as “one long, loud blast of sex, sex in youth, sex in adolescence, sex in maturity … sex bulging, sex tumescent, sex deflated.” And those were the admirers! Critic Clement Greenberg, a nonfan, was appalled when MoMA honored O’Keeffe with a retrospective in 1946—one of its first solo shows for a woman; her work was “little more than tinted photography.” Threatened male artists (sex was their territory!) Edward Hopper and John Sloan were “furious” that she’d been elected to the National Institute of Arts and Letters in 1949 and “tried to intervene.”
Given that reception, it’s amazing O’Keeffe continued making art until close to her death, at 98. Less surprising is that she did it in relative isolation, spending her last 37 years in New Mexico—which only added to her mythology and popularity outside the art world.
The Whitney Museum’s revelatory survey of the work that earned O’Keeffe such derision, the evocative, more-or-less abstract art she made starting in 1915—phenomenally early for an American artist—should reopen eyes to an undeniable fact: O’Keeffe produced some of the most original and ambitious art in the twentieth century. Her ideas about surface, scale, and color are not only daring; they presaged the work of artists as varied as Barnett Newman, Milton Avery, Mark Rothko, Morris Louis, and Mary Heilmann, as well as Color Field painting, Lyrical Abstraction, and contemporary postmodern abstraction. At her best, she is a formally inventive poetic powerhouse who makes the nonobjective feel mystical, familiar, objective, and subjective all at once.
Born poor in 1887 on a farm in Wisconsin, O’Keeffe worked and taught and studied art in Texas, South Carolina, Illinois, and Virginia. Just when it appeared she’d be a teacher for the rest of her life, fate stepped in. On New Year’s Day, 1916, without obtaining her permission, a girlfriend showed O’Keeffe’s abstract charcoal drawings to the legendary photographer-proprietor of New York’s great 291 Gallery, Alfred Stieglitz. With his intrepid eye, he instantly recognized her promise; he’d “never seen a woman express herself so fully on paper … I wouldn’t mind showing them.”
In May, Stieglitz hung ten of her charcoals in a group show. Soon thereafter, she confessed to a friend that she had fallen for the “hot, dark, destructive” (and married) Stieglitz. In 1918, O’Keeffe, 30, moved to New York and within weeks became the 54-year-old Stieglitz’s lover. It was an ardent union, judging from O’Keeffe’s letters to him, one of which described being “on my back—wanting to be spread wide apart.” Whew! That is hot!
As revolutionary as living out of wedlock was in 1918 (the couple married in 1924), a 1921 survey of Stieglitz’s photographs, including 45 pictures of O’Keeffe, many of them nudes, transformed the two of them into the equivalent of an art world Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt. Stieglitz said, “When I make a photograph I make love.” O’Keeffe, who later recalled the “heat and excitement” of the photo sessions, opined that “nothing like them had come into our world before.”
Yet the same nude photos that made Stieglitz famous triggered a backlash against O’Keeffe. Forever after, her work was seen in purely sexual terms. “When people read erotic symbols into my paintings they’re really talking about their own affairs,” O’Keeffe said. Still, the sexualized misconceptions of her work devastated her. “I almost wept,” she wrote of one review in 1921.
The Whitney’s focused show, carefully organized by curator Barbara Haskell, includes over 125 works and more than a dozen Stieglitz portraits. What strikes you about O’Keeffe’s paintings is their restraint and reticence. And the astounding imagination. The sexuality barely registers—which makes the show feel strangely defensive, like it’s scared to let O’Keeffe be as weird, mystical, and suggestive as she really was. I would have appreciated more of her terrified, tentative retreats from and flirtations with abstraction and nature in the twenties, thirties, and forties; her kind-of-like nature/kind-of-figurative hedged bets of the fifties; the oddball flat sixties abstractions; the almost-dissipated seventies works. Out of the Erotic Ghetto
There are naughty bits. But when compared with the work of her closest stylistic contemporary and influence Arthur Dove, it is Dove, not O’Keeffe, who comes off as being “about sex.” Dove plays the brooding, physical Walt Whitman of Leaves of Grass to O’Keeffe’s intricate Emily Dickinson. Dove’s touch has sensual weight, animalistic body, and shadowy intensity. O’Keeffe’s art is Spartan, Apollonian, and cerebral—structured, layered, and faceted like abstract sonnets.
In the first two knockout rooms of the Whitney’s show, Haskell gives us O’Keeffe’s early works on paper and her uncanny ability to conjure indivisible abstract wholes in which all parts are of equal interest and never decorative—something Donald Judd made good on decades later. Aside from one darkened gallery of Stieglitz’s super-seductive pictures of her (who knew underarm hair could be so titillating?), from the third gallery on, you’re lowered into O’Keeffe’s lapidarian vision, glowing prismatic color, and luscious thin surfaces. She never overworks anything; the relationship of her interior forms to external edges feels found yet pure as Pythagorean geometry.
“The men,” as she witheringly referred to male contemporaries, tended to paint dark color with gritty surfaces and romantic symbolism. At the Whitney, you see O’Keeffe coaxing brilliant hues onto smooth grounds via colossally magnified, closely cropped, disembodied shapes. At the same time, she’s assimilated Stieglitz’s (and Paul Strand’s) ideas of photography into painting. All these things made her, in her own words, “an outsider.” O’Keeffe’s purer color and form, her surreal scale shifts, were as radical for her time as Warhol’s Day-Glo color and pop-culture references were for his. Like Warhol, she was willing to forsake high-minded ideas of what constituted “serious art,” and risk being branded with the worst insults the art world could muster: girly, swishy, pretty. O’Keeffe wasn’t afraid of those labels. And as the Whitney show demonstrates, her fearless prettiness is also profound and lyrical—an eerie, ineffable joy. Fuck sex. source: http://nymag.com/arts/art/reviews/59249/ August 17 Why we paint.Quote by Jill Saunders:
"Firstly, I am inspired by something,
and I don't know where it comes from.
Secondly, by something that lies behind me.
And thirdly, by everything that could shape the future.
We need to learn to decipher and translate the symbols,
...signals and hieroglyphs that tell us about the future.
Even if only to find them in ourselves."
Greetings
Hannablue
August 16 kleurenleerkleurenschema's om je op te verlekkeren.
Massa's kleuren op een rijtje, én er zit een lgica achter...
Het werkt inspirerend...kijk maar zelf!
Enjoy!
Hannablue
July 25 Inspirational kick in the buttFor some artists, philosophy, literature and art itself is a source of inspiration. Drawing can provide a way of exploring concepts, bouncing thoughts around and expressing feelings that are difficult to put in words. Traditional art forms often used allegorical figures and dramatic gesture, realistically painted, to express these ideas. Modern artists often use abstract means to expess very similar thoughts. Consider some of these approaches:
July 24 Flamenco 3 daagseIk voel me verwant met de Flamenco:Het ontstaan van het woord en het begrip flamenco kent geen simpel antwoord.
Het woord flamenco is ontstaan
uit een almalgaam van verwarring, onbekendheid,
en andere door elkaar heen lopende zaken
van meer of mindere betekenis.
Zigeuners, Vlamingen, Moren, Joden en uiteraard de Spanjaarden,
allen bij hebben gedragen tot het ontstaan van Flamenco.
Yours truely
Hannablue July 23 Defining yourself by your artArt, Drawing and the Tyranny of the MediumDon't be Defined by Your Major
Are you being defined by your medium? Limited by your art major? Perhaps you define yourself as a painter, pastellist, cartoonist or digital artist? It's not unusual. Many of us focus on a single medium, and can find ourselves subconciously defined by it, discarding ideas before they are even fully formed, because they don't fit our usual way of working.
Often art majors are selected according to medium: painting, printmaking, photography. Drawing - 'general' and 'life' (figure drawing) may be separate streams in support of those majors. In some respects it's a good idea - artists often work in one medium or another, and the technical skills needed by each stream can be conveyed by expert practitioners. But at many points the division breaks down; I remember the bemusement of printmaking staff when a student presented a portfolio of paper sculpture; subtle, beautiful things that were regarded as small masterpieces and given a high mark - but which were, incontravertably, not prints. It also quickly locks art students into selecting a technical specialty, before they've fully explored their interests. Self-taught artists can fall into the same trap, setting out to learn a particular skill, then identifying themselves by that skill, rather than seeing the skill as just part of their whole creative expression. Flicking through a recent 'Art Monthly' magazine and astounded by a particularly beautiful and complex installation piece depicted in its pages, I wondered whether the artists responsible would consider themselves to be sculptors. Artists often still describe themselves in terms of their craft: painter, printmaker, video artist. But a look at the most interesting and dynamic art being produced today will soon tell you that defining yourself by your craft is incredibly limiting. An artist's vision is capable of being so much more expansive, and the role of the artist is no longer to 'make a painting' (for consumption of the rich patron) or to make a printing plate (for reproduction for the masses or the media). Contemporary fine art is centered upon the idea, the High Concept that may be clearly articulated before the work is executed, or may emerge as the artist explores their medium. Certainly the form in which you choose to explore or express ideas depends upon your craftsmanship in that medium: for me, a video clip will be a challenge; a welded sculpture possible (especially if I employ a technician to assist in its construction) and a lithograph or watercolor quite easily achieved. But to define myself as a painter or printmaker immediately limits my imagination to something that I can readily express in that format. I have an idea that, contrary to my first-year sculptural ineptitude - I envision as a suspended structure constructed of polished copper. I'll possibly never make the sculpture - it won't get far beyond a sketch in my book - but by allowing myself to concieve of the sculpture rather than forcing the idea to translate into a two-dimensional piece, I've removed heavy fetters from my imagination. Do you define yourself by your craft, or by your art? Could a shift in perception open creative possibilities? This About.com page has been optimized for print. To view this page in its original form, please visit: http://drawsketch.about.com/od/makingalivingfromart/a/artmajor.htm ©2009 About.com, Inc., a part of The New York Times Company. All rights reserved. July 20 quote of the dayJuly 18 in progress by HannablueIntuitive Flowing:
Check out this album with artwork by Hannablue:
your reaction is always welcome
Hannablue Desiderata by Max EhrmanGo placidly amid the noise and the haste,
and remember what peace there may be in silence.
As far as possible, without surrender,
be on good terms with all persons.
Speak your truth quietly and clearly; and listen to others,
even to the dull and the ignorant; they too have their story.
Avoid loud and aggressive persons; they are vexatious to the spirit.
If you compare yourself with others, you may become vain or bitter,
for always there will be greater and lesser persons than yourself.
Enjoy your achievements as well as your plans.
Keep interested in your own career, however humble;
it is a real possession in the changing fortunes of time.
Exercise caution in your business affairs, for the world is full of trickery.
But let this not blind you to what virtue there is; many persons strive for high ideals,
and everywhere life is full of heroism.
Be yourself.
Especially do not feign affection.
Neither be cynical about love;
for in the face of all aridity and disenchantment,
it is as perennial as the grass.
Take kindly the counsel of the years,
gracefully surrendering the things of youth.
Nurture strength of spirit to shield you in sudden misfortune.
But do not distress yourself with dark imaginings.
Many fears are born of fatigue and loneliness.
Beyond a wholesome discipline, be gentle with yourself.
You are a child of the universe no less than the trees and the stars;
you have a right to be here.
And whether or not it is clear to you,
no doubt the universe is unfolding as it should.
Therefore be at peace with God, whatever you conceive Him to be.
And whatever your labors and aspirations, in the noisy confusion of life,
keep peace in your soul.
With all its sham, drudgery and broken dreams,
it is still a beautiful world.
Be cheerful.
Strive to be happy.
☛Max Ehrmann (1872–1945) “Desiderata,” The Poems of Max Ehrmann, p. 165 (1948). There has been confusion about the authorship of this poem. In 1956, the rector of St. Paul’s Church in Baltimore, Maryland, used the poem
in a collection of mimeographed inspirational material for his congregation.
Someone printing it later said it was found in Old St. Paul’s Church, Baltimore, dated 1692.
The year 1692 is the founding date of the church and has nothing to do with the poem,
which was written in 1927.
It was widely distributed with the 1692 date.
A copy of it was found on the bedside table
of Adlai Stevenson’s New York apartment after his death in 1965.
He had been planning to use it on his Christmas cards
identifying it as an ancient poem.
The Stevenson connection helped bring the poem to the attention of the public.
—Fred D. Cavinder, “Desiderata,” TWA Ambassador, August 1973, pp. 14–15. June 04 Per postOntvangen in m'n mailbox:
Dear Godess:
The lady reading this Is beautiful, classy and Strong, and I love Her. Help her live her life to the fullest. Please promote her and Cause her to excel above her expectations. Help her shine in the Darkest places where it is impossible to love. Protect her at all Times, lift her up when she needs you the most, And Let her know when she Walks with you, She will always be Safe. I pass it on to You tooHannablueApril 03 Hans Andreus***Speculaties*** zijn leuker dan **formules**
Wanneer het spinimpulsmoment (welke vreemde en breekbare wannneer in geëlectrificeerde ruimtes (welk licht achter de hand of ook wanneer het leven, (welke dwarse dromen of ook wanneer de tijd slechts (werktuig; speelgoed; op welk slim eiland Onzin, natuurlijk. Hij hoeft niet. oneindig maal niets geeft ********************************************************* uit: Ik hoor het licht,bloemlezing uit de poëzie van Hans Andreus. March 28 verjaardagsmuziekeen klein muziekaal momentje voor mijn verjaardagMiles davis, geschenk gekregen op oscarlewis:
Peace and love
Hannablue
March 27 By Chris MadochKijken en aankomen: gewaagd!
LUST AWAY Even When Temptation is Hard to resist It’s Often Best To keep things Zipped. Non-conformists And Catholics alike Dampening our animal antics With Dour ironic campness Take a cold shower! Take a hike. Self denial- Try it IN For a while. It just might Bring A smile To Your Faded Dick-head Jaded appetite. Maybe so Bishop baby But no, no, no, Not tonight. Yes, Alternatively- Be free; Tuck your conscience Out of sight; Fuck it Suck it Earn a buck from it; Chuck it in your trash, Just another False dawn Flesh crash. Shit happens. Move on. Lust away. Lust away. Lust away. Chris Madoch © 2009 March 26 reanimatieBeste fans van Hannablue,Ik had dit kleine hoekje op het web ge-euthanaseerd met de gedachte dat iedereen op facebook zat en "Hannablue Art "ook daar wel zou vinden,
maar een persoonlijk hoekje hebben om je gedachten met intimi te delen, is er ginds niet echt.
Daarom heb ik besloten om de verhalen van Hannablue terug op de "Blue Lounge" te zetten.
Laat gerust een reactie achter...
groetjes
Hannablue
|
|
|